exclusive american licensing
defense | medical | energy | ai
propulsion | communication| computation
[email protected]all content on theatomicamerican.com and subdomains are the private property of
Michael Chavez II | an american in america
all content was discovered, created, and released by
© 2025 Michael Chavez II / TheAtomicAmerican.com all rights reserved.
this content, including but not limited to its methods, models, systems, and mechanical structures, is proprietary and protected by American patent law.
use or reproduction for any purpose—including educational, commercial, derivative, or system integration—without express written permission is prohibited.dicta • antidote • meet • TheAtomicAmerican.com
TheAtomicExecutive.com | TheAtomicMind.com | TheAtomicMachine.com
The Law of The Land
long antecedent the organization of the state
by TheAtomicAmerican.com
— constructed using a falsify-or-yield format —the atomic method
step zero
-setting the primitives sets the frame-
-controlling the count controls the frame-
-philosophy applied to ontology is systems analysis-
-ontological systems analysis is mechanical not material-
---
i draw a circle;
that circle represents a realm;
you are invited to falsify, counter, or yield at all times.i place an item into the circle;
i examine it from every direction i can;
i reduce it to its irreducible components of wholes, parts, and forces, principles and their attributes, causes and their effects; and
i describe each as faithfully as i can using the most easily understood language;i examine how the wholes, parts, and forces interact, and
i describe each mechanically as i can;-always reconciling to a persistent, objective, describable, triangulated, non-contradictory mechanical reality
-never reconciling to another's opiniongiven, two or more narratives about the wholes, parts, forces, and subsequent interactions:
-i use occam’s razor as a heavily weighted standard as cause and effect works according to the path of least resistance-given different mathematically equivalent narratives,
-i reconcile to the one aligns with the evident instead of the absurd.*
--any theory or institution that alters or dismisses elements from a self-authenticating, fully triangulated count of reality becomes self-referential, and
substitutes itself as the measure of reality rather than the measurer of reality, and bears the burden of demonstrating valid cause for placing itself above reality.-this work is a definitive count of first-order primitives from zero by one ordinary american man-
DETERMINISM FALSIFED AT ROOT BY LIBET
"The subject was asked to wait for one complete revolution of the CRO spot and then, at any time thereafter when he felt like doing so, to perform the quick, abrupt flexion of the fingers and/or the wrist of his right hand...Let the urge to act appear on its own at any time without any preplanning or concentration on when to act', that is, to try to be 'spontaneous' in deciding when to perform each act; this instruction was designed to elicit voluntary acts that were freely capricious in origin."
-Libet 1983
-STRAIGHT FROM THE EXPERIMENT-the experiment presumes the existence of a will capable of spontaneity.the subject performs internal monitoring and selects whether to act or not.Even when the brain shows early readiness potential, the final veto still rests with the subject....that's experimental proof of a higher-order control loop, start to finish...a man reflects, introspects, considers consequences of consequences, meaning not just from materiality but his own experience of encountering materiality;
man can't study free-will without using free-will.free will is the starting position of all scientific inquiry
the very capacity to conduct experiments, make observations, form theories, or even doubt - all of this presupposes the consciousness/free will they're trying to eliminate. all brain scan experiment instructions make this clear:
libet, soon, and haynes all document with laboratory equipment, and strict experimental standards governing both scientist and subject use individual agency to:
develop abstract theories, reason, communicate abstractions to other individuals, comprehend and agree to experiment parameters, focus inward, measure for stimulus, and direct their actions, measure for stimulus.-
and the final results of all this free-will experimentation is a confirmation of free-will.
not only doe the experiment depend on free will for its initiation, regardless of potential animation urges initiated and experienced by the individual, eg, "readiness potential," the individual retains executive authority to evaluate and execute or veto those urges.
an executive authority Libet termed "free-wont".
documenting the atomic mind's |awareness| <+> |will| circuit as the noumena that produces brain wave phenomena, as well as reproducing man's meta cognition and control of the same.you can originate action without external cause,
and even reverse or withhold an internally arising cause. divine stubbornness.every white belt goes through the learning curve of controlling their own proprioception, developing and vetoing readiness potential at will, visualizing and responding to circumstances in their frictionless internal 3-dimensional blackboard on their own command;
free-will is fundamental to study, fundamental to synthesis, and fundamental to man's existence, because free-will is an irreducible constant original to each man.test this yourself, at any moment of your choice, by deliberately acting in any way upon yourself.deliberately thinking, feeling, deliberately rendering a spaceship in your imagination-made out of candy, propriocepting, instantly estimating physics, pre-propricepting, blinking consciously just once, choosing to initiate a “Libet Readiness Potential” mind body connection with limb-feeling the connection-then choosing not to move it, re-writing your own reaction to a stimulus, learning something new and doing any of it against an external pressure, or just to prove that you can for your own entertainment.every one of your deliberate acts falsifies determinism.
and every determinist counter racing through their minds at this moment does the same.it is a pseudo science based on linking abstractions in order to maintain a narrative of an illusory individual.
Introduction
each man is an autonomous causal enginea full counting of man must begin with each man's natural, original condition of his own awareness and will being the exclusive originator of his own actions, making him the active commander of cause & effect in a realm governed by cause & effect;“|I AM HERE| |<+>| |I MOVE ME|”
---------------------------------------
|YOU ARE THERE| |<+>| |YOU MOVE YOU|”It is from this original separate and equal station that man lives among other men, cooperating, innovating, recreating, acquiring-defending-excluding-using-and disposing of property any way he affords himself that does not diminish another doing the same, and organizing associations among himself including instituting, sustaining, operating, and reconciling governance that secures his separate and equal station;It is a natural offense to the original condition of man whenever any rule making of man, including and form of instituted governance becomes destructive to securing his separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle;Then, it becomes the necessary right, the duty for him to throw off such governance; and
— to assume among the powers of earth the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle—...with each man's natural, original condition of his own awareness and will being the exclusive originator of his own actions, making him the active commander of cause & effect in a realm governed by cause & effect;|I AM HERE| |<+>| |I MOVE ME|
My private property
---DO NOT TRESPASS---
__________________________
jointly held property
self authorized ordinary use rights
Permission granted extraordinary use privileges
self authorized ordinary use rights
jointly held property
__________________________
---DO NOT TRESPASS---
Your private property,
|YOU ARE THERE| |<+>| |YOU MOVE YOU|
the power structure of a nation is the infrastructure of that nationTHE AMERICAN POWER STRUCTURE
IS NOT
THE EUROPEAN POWER STRUCTUREamerica is the only nation in history where sovereignty is held by each individual citizen separately/severally and equally/jointly---
There are three parties to every state:
The sovereign,
The sovereign’s government,
The sovereign’s property and subjects
---the european model
The European station of sovereign begins with an abstract corporate will, and reduces to an unembodied abstract will;Roussau’s “social contract”1762 and resulting french revolution 1789-2025 transferred ownership from the flesh and blood monarch to an abstract unembodied, no actual claimant, corporate will, and left themselves as subjects. Feuerbach, Engels, Marx, and run with it in the 1850’s.In their power structure, the individual socialist owns nothing. Not even himself. Not even his children. He has and does as is commanded or he is pruned from the species.
---the american model
the real flesh and blood individual american is born owning two estates:
a private estate which yield non-breach self-authorized enjoyment, employment, defense and disposition authority (severalty);a public estate which yields self- authorized non-breach ordinary use rights (joint tenancy).this is american law even though it is being obscured through Academic, Corporate, Government, Foreign, and Media narration.Thomas Jefferson,
"the God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time; the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them.”
— 1774"to assume... the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle...
...that to secure these rights
Governments are instituted among Men..."
-declaration of independence 1776“We the People of the United States... do ordain and establish...”
— Preamble, Federal Constitution 1787"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."-U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 (Supremacy Clause)1787"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
-U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 4 (Guarantee Clause):1787
federalist No. 33 (1788) (Hamilton): "the propriety of a law... must be determined... by the nature of the specified powers upon which it is founded."federalist No. 45 (1788) (Madison): Confirms the limited scope of delegated authority: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined." (Defines the massive reserve of sovereignty residing with the individual.)Federalist No. 46 (1788) (Madison): Confirms that the state and federal governments are "subordinate agents" of the people, who are the "primary source of power."Federalist No. 54 (1788) (Madison): Establishes property rights as the basis of society, asserting their protection is one of the "great and
primary objects of civil society."Federalist No. 84 (1788) (Hamilton): Explicitly rejects the need for detailed protections for property rights in the Constitution, relying on the antecedent nature of the right itself.
“...in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers...” — Preamble, Bill of Rights 1788---
breach is to completely penetrate a thing. the fringe of a thing is the outermost layer of a thing. to in-fringe is to rub against the outermost layer. to pressure the boundary layer in any action they take whatsoever.
"...being necessary to the security of a free state...shall not be infringed."
-Second Amendment 1788
this ensures the principle/agent status remains real and physical.
---
“...nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
— Fifth Amendment 1788“The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
— Ninth Amendment 1788“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
— Tenth Amendment 1788
"I set out on this ground, which I suppose to be self-evident, 'that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living'.”
— Jefferson (1789)
Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103):
“...the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens.”
-“As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.”
James Madison “Property” essay (1792)
---chisholm v. georgia (1793)
The Supreme Court immediately affirmed the transfer of sovereignty from the Crown to the individual citizen in the first major case addressing federal jurisdiction:“at the revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country...
the citizens of america are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty...
...that the joint and equal sovereigns of this country should, in the very constitution by which they...bring into action and enforce this great and glorious principle —
that the people are the sovereign of this country, and consequently
that fellow citizens and joint sovereigns cannot be degraded by appearing with each other in their own courts to have their controversies determined.”the eleventh amendment (1795):
secures the primacy of the people of each state and protects them from external actors."the judicial power of the united states shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the united states by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state."-st. george tucker (1803)
"in america, the people are sovereign… each citizen being a constituent part of the sovereign."
blackstone's commentaries: with notes of reference to the constitution and laws of the federal government of the united states and of the commonwealth of virginia tucker, vol. i, appendix note d-james kent (1826–1830)
"Government derives its powers from their grant, not their surrender."
The right of the citizen to the free use of public highways is a common right""The sense of property is powerfully increased by the sacred protection of law. Civil government is instituted for the protection of property, and justice is the great spring and cement of society."
"The right of property is a fundamental and sacred right."
commentaries on american lawrawle (1825)
"The rights of property are founded in the law of nature, and are anterior to all human compact."
a view of the constitutionjefferson (1826)
"the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of god. these are grounds of hope for others.
50th anniversary of the declaration of independenceThe american's two-estatesA. Each American holds two estates:Private Estate (Severalty): Exclusive, not licensable by agentsPublic Estate (Joint Tenancy): Equal ownership among all citizens.B. Consequence of the Public Estate:Ordinary use of the public estate (common right) is a RIGHT.Extraordinary use of the public estate (use as a place of business) is a PRIVILEGE requiring regulation and taxation.This distinction is precisely affirmed:
“The common right of all the citizens to navigate the public waters is unquestioned; but the right to erect a dam or other obstruction which impedes that navigation is not a common right; it is a franchise.”
Willson v. Black Bird Creek Marsh Co., 27 U.S. (2 Pet.) 245 (1829) (Chief Justice Marshall):
-“The right of passing and repassing upon public highways and public waters belongs to every individual of the community, and is not a franchise or privilege granted by the government." -prevailing councilcourt:
“The object and end of all government is to promote the happiness and prosperity of the community by which it is established; and it can never be assumed, that the sovereign act of a State, which looks to objects of common interest, and is made for the common good, intended to destroy or to impair the rights of its own citizens.
…While the rights of private property are sacredly guarded, we must not forget that the community also have rights, and that the happiness and well-being of every citizen depends on their faithful preservation.…The continued existence of a government would be of no great value, if by implications and presumptions it was disarmed of the powers necessary to accomplish the ends of its creation…The great highways of the commonwealth—the navigable waters and the public roads—are open to all citizens upon the same terms; and no individual can exclude others from their use, or appropriate them to himself, except by grant from the public.”
-Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 36 U.S. (11 Pet.) 420 (1837)
-"The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace,
and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances.
No doctrine, involving the least suspension of its provisions, can be tolerated in any emergency or at any time in this country.”
Ex parte Milligan (1866)
----
Munn v. Illinois (1877) dissent:
“If this be admitted, the whole field of private rights will be at the mercy of legislative majorities.”
the case and the dissent get worked out almost immediately. price controls are limited to privilege just as stated.
------
“It has been a common practice in the states to authorize individuals or corporations to construct wharves in harbors, and along navigable streams, and to collect wharfage upon vessels landing at such wharves…
The right to land at the wharves of a city, or upon the banks of navigable rivers, and to discharge and receive freight, is a privilege which may be granted, regulated, or withheld by the public authorities.
…
The use of the public highways for the ordinary travel of the citizen is a common right, but the use of them for the purpose of carrying on a private business for profit is an extraordinary use, and may be regulated or prohibited.
It is a settled principle, grown up with the common law, that the public have a right of passage over navigable waters, and that this right may be regulated by law, but cannot be destroyed.The public have a right of way over all navigable waters, and the right to land at the wharves of cities and towns, and to load and unload at such places as the public convenience may require; but this is a common right, and not a franchise. The right to collect wharfage is a franchise, and may be granted by the public authorities.”
-Packet Company v. St. Louis (The St. Louis Wharf Case), 100 U.S. 423 (1879)
-“The right to follow any of the common occupations of life is an inalienable right… it is a distinguishing privilege of citizens of the United States… It is the right of every man to pursue his profession or vocation without asking leave of any officer of the government.”
-Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, 757 (1884)
-
“Illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing… by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes.
It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen,
and against any stealthy encroachments thereon.”
Boyd v. United States (1886)
--
"The ordinary right of the citizen to use the streets in the usual way is a common right. The use of the streets as a place of business is an extraordinary use… a mere license or privilege."
-Hadfield v. Lundin, 98 Wash. 659, (1917)
-“The streets of a city belong to the people of the state, and the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen.”
— Ex parte Corvey, 220 Mo. App. 602, 287 S.W. 879 (1926)
-“The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot be rightfully deprived.”
— Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22 (1929)
-
“The Constitution is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men…
No doctrine involving the least suspension of its provisions can be tolerated.”
Carpenter v. United States (1934)
-
“The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty and to pursue happiness.”
— Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367, 154 S.E. 579 (1930)
-
“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways … is a right protected by the Federal Constitution … No statutory duty lies upon citizens to submit to a license requirement as a condition precedent to exercising that right.”
— Robertson v. Department of Public Works(1973) ,
180 Wash. 133, 39 P.2d 596 (1934) (quoted and followed in dozens of later cases)
-“The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
— Teche Lines v. Danforth, 195 Miss. 226, 12 So.2d 784 (1944) (quoting dozens of earlier authorities)
-
“The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law … Freedom of movement across frontiers in either direction, and inside frontiers as well, was part of our heritage. Travel abroad, like travel within the country … may be as close to the heart of the individual as the choice of what he eats, or wears, or reads.”
— Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125-27 (1958) (citing the entire line of common-right cases)
-“The right to travel freely from state to state, and to use the public highways for that purpose, is a fundamental constitutional right …
The use of the public highways by private citizens for private purposes is a common right, not a mere privilege …
A state may not impose a charge or requirement for the exercise of a constitutional right.”
United States v. One 1968 Chevrolet Impala, 312 F.Supp. 709 (N.D. Ga. 1970)
-"The Second Amendment codified a pre-existing right...
...It is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct.””
— Heller 2008, 554 U.S. at 592.
-
“The right to keep and bear arms is fundamental to our scheme of ordered liberty.”
— McDonald, 2010 561 U.S. at 767.
-
“The Second Amendment extends… to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.”
Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U.S. 411 (2016).
-
“When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct.
The government must then justify its regulation by demonstrating
that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation......the Second Amendment is not a second-class right......the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest.
The Constitution demands a more rigorous showing.
— Bruen,2022 142 S. Ct. at 2156
...i am here <+> i move me ≡ original ownership ≡ separate and equal station ≡ the supreme law of the species that mechanically produces the ontological republic
awareness <+> will = free will
free will= original ownership
original ownership = separate and equal station
→seperate: individual private property
→equal: joint tenancy of the usufruct republic
→ constitution: administrative protocol
→government: instituted among not over
→stat
american civics 101
ownership = ultimate authority to control without breach = sovereignty
=original lawful authority=the people atomize to the individual american
the atomic american joins with his american peers in law called american people"at the revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country...the citizens of america are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty..."
-chisolm v georgia 1793“we the people of the united states... do ordain and establish...”
— preamble, Federal Constitution 1787"the people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them"
-california government code - gov § 54950if you want the law in a circumstance, you must invoke it.the american has access to every bit of written and unwritten law at all times and for the purpose of securing his private and joint estates, but the American is responsible for knowing the law, invoking the law, gathering evidence, and getting into the court records.the law, his rights are infinite tools in an infinite tool belt each american carries with him and can deploy at all times for infinite uses that do not breach.the american system is adversarial and depends on all parties staking their claims when encountering one another, and updating the record through the courts when a party breaches another.
if a party does not, they forfeit by silence.the american government is your peer, not your authority, it is your instrument and sometimes your adversary, and it is not responsible for knowing and asserting your rights in a circumstance.it is not patriotic to obey american government office holders.it is patriotic to know and uphold american law including its power structure and machinery."...that whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends..."
— declaration of Independence 1776"the state cannot diminish the rights of the people."
— hurtado v. california 1884"anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.”
— federal crop ins. corp v. merrill, 332 U.S. 380 1947"it is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."
— american Communications association v. douds, 339 U.S. 382 1950breach is breach regardless of party or packaging
just as no joint tenant may diminish another joint tenant's rights, no american may diminish another american's private or joint estate by any means especially not by statute, bureaucratic assumption, or street mob violence.and every american can defend his private and joint estates from such breach.that's the american's function and discretion as a several and joint principal. he doesn't have to stop another from stealing his firewood but he can if he wishes.the law belongs to each american.
-and its about as difficult as driving a car-
Proposition|Awareness|<+>|Will| ≡ Original Ownership ≡
Separate and Equal Station|I AM HERE| |<+>| |I MOVE ME| = |I OWN ME|
my private property
---DO NOT TRESPASS---
__________________________
|jointly held property|
|self authorized ordinary use rights|
-permission granted extraordinary use privileges-
|self authorized ordinary use rights|
|jointly held property|
__________________________
---DO NOT TRESPASS---
your private property
|YOU ARE THERE|<+> |YOU MOVE YOU| = |YOU OWN YOU|
|Awareness|<+>|Will| ≡ Original Ownership ≡
Separate and Equal StationAmericans have both an estate of private property they own severally and a public estate they own jointly;
Joint tenancy mechanically produces restraints, duties, rights, privileges, breaches, and remedies:**Each fully owning their own, each fully co-owning the whole, each able to acquire, control, defend and dispose of their own in any way that does not diminish another, each with the ability to use and defend the whole;All with the power to defend and dispose the whole, all with the power to regulate and tax the privileged use of the whole;
none with the authority to diminish another, none subordinate to another;Joint Tenancy Secures each American's Separate and Equal station and yields ordinary use rights.
Original ownership is a fact of human nature;
Each Constitution recognizes this fact;However, both Americans, and American Governments are applying statutes meant to tax and license privileges to Americans exercising original private and ordinary use rights.Per Marbury, the Constitution governs over conflicting legislation,
any governance violating original rights is avoidable by the American, and if prosecuted by the government, voidable in litigation;Therefore, much of our interaction with the administrative state is self inflicted and could be avoided through sorting ourselves properly.This can be accomplished with one constitutional Miranda warning at the top of administrative paperwork:-NOTICE-
As one of the people of this state, you may have the Right to engage in this activity lawfully without taxation or licensure.
DO NOT FILE FOR ORDINARY USEThis reasserts:
original ownership,
separate and equal station,
rights vs privileges,
and the principal–agent power structure of the American republic.
THE CLOSED SELF-AUTHORIZATION CIRCUIT
the closed loop of autonomous volition is one fundamental constant of the species manthe self-authorization circuit makes the individual unit of consciousness the exclusive and ultimate authority to control oneself.will initiates new causal chains that are predictably mediated by the environment.
the environment responds predictably to the individual's push.Ultimate Authority to control is Ownership;
Ownership is the Ultimate Authority to control.
Self Ownership is the original condition of each man, making it the fundamental constant of man | an invariant condition of exclusive conscious control.The action of living itself is the exercise of ownership - conscious exclusive control over self. There is no living without measurement of self, and action upon self.All external attempts to command another must breach the separate and equal |awareness| <+> |will| self-authorization circuit possessed naturally by each individual.No outside force can make one man act upon himself.
"Whether a gun is pointed at a man's head or gold is placed at his feet, only he can choose to bend his own knees...or even pay attention..."consciousness is the autodidactic aware initiator of force that commands cause & effect in a realm governed by cause & effect.Consciousness' and its |awareness|<+>|will| circuit is a directly observable, describable, demonstrable, repeatable constant, that is falsifiable by every healthy adult- so it must be included it in an ontological count of the cosmos, and of man.THE CONSTANT OF MAN IS INDIVIDUAL FREE WILL
The singular naturally born man is the irreducible unit of mankind; The unmanifest can only become manifest through the individual;
All groups are reifications, and however organized, consist of individuals building on one another's personal attainments;
the essence of our species is found in the every single individual, each being a fractal materialization consisting of at a minimum:measurement of self, action on self, autonomy, restraint, critical thinking, total subjective reward attribution, focus, code, decode, introspection, self-updating, error auditing, executive override, autonomous total visualization, origination, pattern recognition, measurement of self, readiness potential, veto power, proprioception, proprioceptive projection, instant physics estimation, evaluation, all manners of authorship and action upon self. meta awareness, self updating, memory, novel and creative utilization, abstract thinking, abstract decoding, self updating and every form of executive inspection, evaluation, and updating of any part of the circuit one is aware of. Wait did i say self updating?...let me check;)The species' full set of primitives lives in every healthy individual.Washington v. Glucksberg (1997): substantive due process protects fundamental rights deeply rooted in history/tradition.Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992): liberty = right to define one’s own concept of existence.District of Columbia v. Heller (2008): core right of self-defense.
Ownership mechanically produces rights, defines privileges, and is procedurally recognized as standingTwo Elements: Will & Property
One Authority: Ownership
Two Classes of Actions: Rights & Privileges
Ownership is the original AUTHORITY to control property;Rights are Self-Authorized Actions with One’s own property;Privileges are Owner-Permitted Actions with the Owners property;Liberty is the total of all rights and privileges available to the individual- this is recognized by the fifth amendment;One must substantiate ownership to claim authority over derivative rights.*Private Property Ownership originates all self-authorized actions that control including: to Use, Defend, Exclude & Dispose.*Private Property begins with one's own soul, mind, body, labor and extends outwards to include all the tangible and intangible properties one acquires.
privately owned wheelbarrowit is an original right for me to move my dirt with my wheelbarrow anyway I can afford myself that doesn't diminish another doing the same.it is a privilege aka "2nd class right" for you to move your dirt with my wheelbarrow and you must consent to my terms and conditions.owner-permitted privilege = “2nd class Right” extraordinary use permission requirednotice the same act with the same property is a right for me and a privilege for you"Such difficulties indicate that the dichotomy between personal liberties and property rights is a false one. Property does not have rights. People have rights. The right to enjoy property without unlawful deprivation, no less than the right to speak or the right to travel, is, in truth, a 'personal' right, whether the 'property' in question be a welfare check, a home, or a savings account. In fact, a fundamental interdependence exists between the personal right to liberty and the personal right in property. Neither could have meaning without the other."” Lynch v. Household Finance Corp. (1972)
-"Michigan law grants a tenant by the entirety some of the most essential property rights: the right to use the property, to receive income produced by it, and to exclude others from it. See Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U. S. 374, 384 (1994) ("[T]he right to exclude others" is " 'one of the most essential sticks in the bundle of rights that are commonly characterized as property''' (quoting Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U. S. 164, 176 (1979))); Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U. S. 419, 435 (1982) (including "use" as one of the "[p]roperty rights in a physical thing")...(the right to "dispose" of an item is a property right).
-
United States v. Craft, 535 U.S. 274 (2002)
